
This moth is considered native in the United States, attacking willow (Guillèn et al. 2001). It is believed that a host-shift occurred to multiple non-native plants including all varieties of citrus and cerain ornamentals, such as oleander (Jones 2001). Citrus peelminer has been reported to occur in low numbers in Florida and at least three Marmara species have been identified in the state (Heppner 2000). Recent evaluations of an experimental pheromone lure that is still under development by researchers at the University of California, Riverside have confirmed captures of citrus peelminer (Marmara sp.) in Polk County, Florida.
Egg: The whitish and oval-shaped egg hatches within four to five days and the emerging larva immediately bores into the epidermal cell layer of the fruit peel or stem.
Larva: The larval stage is comprised of three distinct morphological forms (Kerns et al. 2004). The initial form occurs during the first four instars and feeds on sap while mining. This form is flat, yellowish in color and approximately 4 mm in length. Thereafter, the larva molts into a non-feeding intermediate form. During the final stage known as the spinning larva, the peelminer exits the mine, lowers itself via a silken thread to a leaf or bark crevice and pupates.
Pupa: The pupal stage lasts about 10 days and the entire life cycle requires approximately 30 days (Kerns et al. 2004).
Other fruits known to harbor occasional infestations include apple, apricot, avocado, cherry, kiwi, olive, papaya, peach, and watermelon. It also heavily infests certain ornamentals such as Grecian laurel, Japanese maple, oleander, willow, and wisteria as well as weeds such as green amaranth and tall morningglory (Grafton-Cardwell 2001).
Scouting for citrus peelminer larvae can be conducted by inspecting fruit for the presence of developing mines. Fruit on the inside lower canopy is preferred; therefore, scouting should target the lower 4 ft of the tree canopy (Kerns et al. 2004). Citrus peelminer damage on fruit can be distinguished from citrus leafminer in that the latter insect leaves a trial of frass in the leaf mine while the former does not.
Cultural control. Cultural control is an option if growers have the flexibility of avoiding the most susceptible varieties or have the capability of removing highly susceptible neighboring plants. The most susceptible varieties include Fukumoto oranges, grapefruit, and pummelos (Anonymous 2005). Neighboring crops which can increase the incidence of peelminer infestation in citrus groves include cotton and grapes and should be avoided if possible.
Biological control. Biological control of citrus peelminer can be very effective in certain regions. The native eulophid wasp, Cirrospilus coachellae, can provide 60 to 90% parasitism of peelminer larvae, particularly later in the season near the end of August (Guillèn et al. 2003). Although this wasp is a highly effective parasitoid in some areas such as the Coachella Valley of California (Guillèn et al. 2003), it does not survive winters in more northerly regions such as the San Joaquin Valley, where it does not provide sufficient control of this pest (Anonymous 2005). Also, predacious mites, such as the Yuma spider mite, attack the larval stage (Kerns et al. 2004).
Chemical control. Management of citrus peelminer with chemical insecticides has often proven marginally effective because it is difficult to obtain good spray coverage and penetrate the mines where larval feeding occurs. Several insecticides have been evaluated in California with limited success. These include neonicotinoids, organophosphates, and carbamates. It was concluded that chemical control of citrus peelminer with the most effective toxicants would require sprays every three weeks, which is not only expensive but also an unsound IPM practice (Grafton-Cardwell and Reagan 2001). Spinosad, a lactone isolated from the microorganism Saccharopolyspsora spinosa, has been shown to effectively kill larval citrus peelminer; however, inner canopy coverage is required for effective control (Kerns et al. 2004).
Author: Lukasz L. Stelinski. University of Florida
Photographs: Jack Clark, University of California ANR Communication Services in Davis; Michael Rogers, University of Florida
Project Coordinator: Thomas R. Fasulo, University of Florida
Publication Number: EENY-415
Publication Date: October 2007
Copyright 2007 University of Florida
Featured Creatures
Department of Entomology and Nematology
Division of Plant Industry
Electronic Data Information Source