
Introduction - Distribution - Life Cycle - Identification - Economic Importance - Selected References
A. grandis adult - unusual color form
Eggs: Approximately 1 mm in diameter, with short projections around operculum. They are laid 100 to 200 at a time in multiple row masses. On soybean stems these masses are usually four to five rows wide, but may be as much as 10 rows wide on paper toweling in the laboratory.
Nymphs:
1st instar. The length is approximately 1.5 mm and the humeral width is 0.9 mm. These are difficult to distinguish from the first instar nymphs of Euthyrhynchus floridanus (Linnaeus) as both have a blue-black head and thorax and red abdomen with dark central and lateral "stripes" composed of dorsal and lateral dark colored plates. Nymphs of this age do not stray far from the egg mass and may be distinguished by the form of the mass and numbers of eggs, whereas E. floridanus egg masses are loosely oval and contain 20 to 90 eggs.
2nd instar. The length is approximately 3 mm while the humeral width is 1.3 mm. A. grandis begins to capture insect prey in the 2nd instar. At this stage the nymph has differentiated somewhat from the color of the 2nd instar nymph of E. floridanus and has become more uniformly brownish with faint markings on the abdomen.
3rd instar. The length is 4–5 mm and the humeral width is 2.3 mm. At this stage the nymph has acquired red lateral keels on the pronotum and is generally bluish-black with a brownish abdomen.
4th instar. The length is 7–8 mm while the humeral width is 3.8 mm. The 4th instar nymph has larger red lateral keels on the pronotum. The general color of the nymph is bluish black. The wing pads are visible, but not prominent.
5th instar. The length is 10–14 mm while the humeral width is 6.5 mm. The 5th instar nymph has distinct wing pads and very large red lateral keels on the pronotum.
group predatory behavior
Economic Importance
Although little has been written on this species, it has been reported to be an important predator of soybean pests in Florida (Watson 1916, Whitcomb 1973). It has also been reported to be a pest on eggplant (Watson 1922), but damage to any crops by this species is probably exceptional.
Selected References
Author: David B. Richman, University of Florida, and Frank W. Mead (retired), Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry.
Originally published as DPI Entomology Circular 192.
Photographs: Division of Plant Industry; Lyle J. Buss and others, University of Florida
Project Coordinator: Thomas R. Fasulo, University of Florida
Publication Number: EENY-165
Publication Date: October 2000. Latest revision: March 2011.
Copyright 2000-2011 University of Florida
Featured Creatures
Department of Entomology and Nematology
Division of Plant Industry
Electronic Data Information Source